Search for: "United States v. Oregon" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Czech Republic Czech Arbitration Court wants to speed up UDRP process (Managing Intellectual Property) Finland Finland, Spain bringing 1Mbps broadband to everyone (Ars Technica) Germany More on IPCom and its litigation with HTC in Germany (IAM) India Google Book settlement – Indian government protests... finally (Spicy IP) Cybersquatting gets sharp rap from INDRP Arbitration: Bloomberg finance wins (Spicy IP) Sweden Swedish internet traffic recovers after initial… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:48 am by Daniel Richardson
  Father has never set foot in Vermont (or the United States). [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:30 pm
  One example of such a case was United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:02 am by Marie Louise
Yes (Michael Geist) Liberals preparing C-32 amendments on digital locks & fair dealing (Michael Geist) UBC launches license database as Access Copyright Agreement nears expiry (Michael Geist) Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore on how copyright can treat consumers unfairly (Michael Geist) Quebec National Assembly passes motion criticizing C-32 (Michael Geist) Separating copyright facts from fiction ahead of legislative hearings (Michael Geist) China Microsoft win in China over pirated… [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:25 pm by Yelena Wang
According to a statistical analysis conducted by KKC, the United States obtained over $270 million in sanctions from 100 polluters and paid 206 whistleblowers a total of more than $33 million in rewards under APPS. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Mark Walsh
United States on behalf of Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Justice Department. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:02 pm by Marty Lederman
For starters, there’s the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA), which requires a state to register for federal elections any person who resides outside the United States and (but for such residence) would be qualified to vote in that state if it was the last place in which the person was domiciled before leaving the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:48 am by Kyle Persaud
Oregon, the Supreme Court held that states and localities could not prohibit freedom of assembly either. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
  At no time was the United States Government or any federal official a party to any action.The particular proceeding that came to the Supreme Court as Medellin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:17 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court Oregon: ‘Confidential’ accusation creates substantial controversy sufficient to exercise subject matter jurisdiction: Google Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:31 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967); and as the Supreme Court held in Soldal v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
Oregon: so far this year, the only legislative enactment to constrict the rights of law-abiding gun-owners. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]