Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
In its determination, the Court looked at s4 of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and authorities such as the landmark case of Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. s4 MCA 2005 states that, in determining best interests, all relevant circumstances should be considered, including the person’s past and present wishes and feelings, and the views of those close to him. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm
Aukerman Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 4:11 am
The ruling on Tony Bland is now nearly twenty years old (Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789) and there the patient was in a permanent vegetative state after being crushed at the 1989 Hillsborough stadium disaster. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The other two panelists will focus on United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:12 am
Recognition and proprietary consequences of a UK civil partnership in South Africa The decision in AC v CS 2011 2 SA 360... [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm
” Now let’s look at a sample case: In Conning v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:06 am
” Jack of Kent blog 16th September - “Today’s Met Statement“ Case law which may be of some relevance: X v Morgan Grampian [1991] 1 AC 1 – interpretation of “interests of justice” in the Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.10 Secretary of State for defence v Guardian Newspapers [1984] 2 WLR 268 – “national security” in Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.10 Re an Inquiry under the Company Securities (Insider… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:50 pm
In the matter of Walter v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
In Community for Creative Non-Violence v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
They also linked “Ace” to Ben Hager, who was the registered user of the CujoBen@webtv email account. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:46 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
" Turning to the authorities, Mr Justice Moylan stated (at paragraph 61): "My task is to determine "the division of property which best achieves the fair overall outcome": Charman v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
In Salem Advocate Bar Association v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
Nobles v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Other than that, it’s all Aces. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:56 am
This question arose before the England & Wales High Court in Barthelemy v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:47 pm
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
