Search for: "Christian v. United States" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,921
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2012, 4:39 am by SHG
Roosevelt asked the men of the Philippines to fight, promising them United States citizenship and veterans benefits in return. 200,000 fought. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery –… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:17 am by brown
Supreme Court’s decision in January not to hear a challenge to lower court holdings in Joyner v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
Germany Claudia Schubert, Whistle-Blowing after Heinisch v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:49 am by boston
”Americans United filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case, Sherman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Lisa Milam-Perez
Nor did the EEOC’s April ruling in Macy v Holder create a new protected class of transgender people, Feldblum said. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am by Joshua Matz
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Julia Angwin and Jess Bravin report on arguments made by the government in a GPS tracking case in the Ninth Circuit in light of the Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar concurs with other commentators who have suggested that Jeffrey Toobin’s behind-the-scenes account of Citizens United v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am by Conor McEvily
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am by Rachit Buch
In MGN v United Kingdom, on balancing Article 8 and 10 rights, the Strasbourg Court stated (§142): The balancing of individual interests, which may well be contradictory, is a difficult matter and Contracting States must have a broad margin of appreciation in this respect since the national authorities are in principle better placed than this Court to assess whether or not there is a “pressing social need” capable of justifying an interference… [read post]