Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 1261 - 1280 of 32,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact several options could be possible: it could well be that the ED no longer upheld the lack of clarity objection but considered the lack of inventive step detrimental or that clarity and novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1 was at stake, or even that only the amended description was not considered allowable. [8] This is at odds with the established jurisprudence that for the requirements of R 68(2) EPC 1973 to be fulfilled the decision must include, in logical… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Sebelius, 18 No. 8 Westlaw Journal Health Law 1, Westlaw Journal Health Law December 21, 2010A federal judge in Virginia has rejected a key part of President Obama's health care reform law, ruling it is unconstitutional to require people to purchase or obtain health insurance or face a penalty. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:38 am by Trent
Accordingly, claims 1, 2, 5-8, 13, 16, and 17 were not improper hybrid claims. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”* 8 NYCCR §275.11(c) requires that in the event the petitioner is seeking removal of a school officer, in addition to the notice required by 8 NYCRR §275.11(a) “the notice provisions of section 277.1 of this Title shall also apply. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 6:20 am by Anubha Sinha
Meanwhile, defendant 1 filed an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and sought for arbitration. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Timothy Lorang
Too often a company will set up a pay-per-click ad campaign, make the mistakes listed in points 1 through 8 and conclude that paid search is a complete waste of time. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:14 am by Juliette Passer, Esq.
• Call 1-888-407-4747 toll-free in the United States and Canada or 1-202-501-4444 from other countries from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:37 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5, H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5,H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:14 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
The Prospectus Regulation does not apply to an offer of securities to the public with a total consideration in the EU of less than 1 million EUR calculated over a period of 12 months. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:08 pm by Ashley Deeks
Does Maliki have a valid constitutional claim, and, if he does, how is that claim likely to play out? [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:10 pm
What is the implication of copying the exemptions to disclosure listed in Section 8 of the RTI Act on to Section 4 of the WBP Act? [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:48 pm by Howard Knopf
From: "Gilles.McDougall@cb-cda.gc.ca" Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:57:49 -0400To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSubject: Access Copyright Post-Secondary Educational Institutions Tariff (2011-2013) ORDER OF THE BOARDThe June 15, 2011 "encouragement" from professor Katz that the Commissioner of Competition be asked to participate in the examination of the June 8, 2011 application by the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada for the addition of a transactional licence in… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 1:02 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court issued an 8-1 opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas that gives law enforcement greater discretionary latitude in stopping motor vehicles. [read post]