Search for: "David A. Kennedy" Results 1261 - 1280 of 2,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 26 March 2014, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Carnwath and Toulson) gave judgment in the case of Kennedy v Charity Commission ([2014] UKSC 20). [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel A. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
  Our Jason Knott weighed in with two excellent, in-depth pieces examining both the majority opinion as well as the concurring and dissenting opinions (including the very unusual dissenting lineup of Sotomayor, Kennedy, and Alito). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:28 am by John Fullerton III
Justices Scalia and Thomas joined in principal part, while Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kennedy and Alito, dissented. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:28 am by John F. Fullerton III
Justices Scalia and Thomas joined in principal part, while Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kennedy and Alito, dissented. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The letter, written by the organization’s Group Vice President for Research, David S. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
—Randall Kennedy"Legal Fictions represents a culmination (if not the culmination) of Karla FC Holloway's rich corpus of criticism and theory. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Kennedy wrote the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Russell Cohen rises for the detainees to address Judges David Tatel, Janice Rogers Brown and A. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  David Cameron plans to impose mandatory nationwide family friendly filtering by default on all computers by end of 2014; Australia has also made efforts in this regard. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Although Justice Kennedy noted that Congress has the power to make determinations of marital rights and privileges, as it does, for example, in immigration law, it has traditionally deferred to state-law determinations of marital status for purposes of implementing almost every federal law. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am by Jane Chong
In their filings, the appellant detainees did not invoke Justice Kennedy’s interpretation either. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:54 am by Terry Hart
But lately, it has seen a steady and troubling expansion, one that more and more is comfortable with letting the common good override individual rights.1 For those who fall on the “fair use has gone too far” side, who are worried about large companies getting a “volume discount” on fair use to excuse the wholesale copying of millions of works,2 or who share the concerns of Supreme Court Justice Kennedy—who said in his concurrence in Campbell v. [read post]
With regard to the first factor, Judge Reinhardt correctly concludes that Justice Kennedy’s opinion in Windsor examines the actual purpose of DOMA in considerable detail, and that an emphasis on the legislature’s actual purpose strongly suggests that some form of heightened scrutiny is being applied. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:15 am by David Markus
  He's added these new terms to the book, which he picked up from ATL founder David Lat. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 10:04 am
But then David Kennedy notes a half-dozen other independent security researchers who reviewed Kennedy's analysis and agree that Obamacare security is inadequate. [read post]