Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 7,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2011, 6:57 am
Supreme Court decided Gray v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:15 am
However, the primary custodian does not have rights superior to the other parent, in making other decisions related to the child’s upbringing. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:15 am
However, the primary custodian does not have rights superior to the other parent, in making other decisions related to the child’s upbringing. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
In Fulton County Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:03 pm
ASIC contended that, notwithstanding the existence of a clause in the letter which excluded the existence of such a relationship, the investment bank breached certain fiduciary duties to its client by failing to obtain the client's informed consent to proprietary trading in the takeover target's shares by another division of the bank.The Court decided that the law does not prevent an investment bank from contracting out of, or modifying, any fiduciary obligations. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or she is… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
November 6, 2018 In a recent decision handed down by the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, in Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:33 am
The Superior Court judge had held that the counterclaim was barred, and the Court of Appeal agreed. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:54 am
The appeal in the Penn-Co case Court of Appeal was from a 2011 decision of the Ontario Superior Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
The Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., Real Parties In Interest (2014) ___ Cal.4th ___, Case No. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:51 am
The court also found state law does not expressly forbid regulation. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:58 am
In Luther v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 8:20 pm
Bennett v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 3:11 pm
Marxsen, San Benito County Superior Court # PR 210006 [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:20 pm
On an appeal from the in the Los Angeles Superior Court, the Court of Appeal in McGann v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:15 am
O'Bryan v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
But what does the duty require in practice? [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 5:18 pm
A Superior Court said yes, but the Second District Court of Appeal says "No. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:42 am
Superior Court continues to change the legal landscape. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Superior Ct. of Cal., 436 U.S. [read post]
