Search for: "Dunn v. Dunn"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2010, 8:16 am
United States and Shell Oil v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
” The Court referred to a 19th century House of Lords decision: Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67, expressing a principle which should be obvious to anyone in adversarial legal practice: “… I have always understood that if you intend to impeach a witness you are bound, whilst he is in the box, to give him an opportunity of making any explanation which is open to him; and, as it seems to me, that is not only a rule of professional practice in the conduct of a case,… [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
” As noted above, the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Becerra; and the Colorado baker gay-marriage case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
(Schnatter v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Before moving on to the last item, I wanted to point out this Anita Lee story in the Sun Herald on the Jones v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
” Manson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
Simons Waterfront LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
We are intimately familiar with the rules of evidence, both statutory and uncodified, and understand the rationale for the counterintuitive principle expressed in Browne v Dunn. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
Network v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:04 am
More than most novice justices, Alito has taken bullets for business in the term just ended, most notably for his controversial majority opinion in Ledbetter v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:32 am
And audio recordings of Supreme Court oral arguments, taken from the LII’s Oyez site, are an important part of “Roe”, Lisa Loomer’s play about Roe v Wade. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am
And when it’s former-associate v. firm, that’s all the more interesting. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am
.'s Office filed a brief asserting that it had "carefully reviewed the facts and law and determined that Wharton's ineffectiveness claim fulfills the criteria articulated in Strickland v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Grow - http://tinyurl.com/3dk9rmo (Cas Purdy) Deloitte Global Corporate Counsel Report 2011 - http://tinyurl.com/3gbdrc4 (Registration Required) (Deloitte) eDiscovery Basics: Litigation Preparedness (Vol. 1, No. 3) http://tinyurl.com/4xfffbz (Gibson Dunn) June Edition of Corporate Counsel Magazine - Online - http://tinyurl.com/3efpac7 (ALM) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 1 - http://tinyurl.com/3ojftdf (Kayleigh Roberts, Ashley Trent) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights:… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
