Search for: "Edwards v. Means"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am
The modern definition of “free culture” to mean a permissionless culture — one that calls for a regressive weakening of creators’ rights — is a dramatic reversal of longstanding conceptions of property and freedom. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:52 am
Commonwealth, supra (quoting Edwards v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
(relisted after the April 24 conference) Edwards v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The second ground of appeal, on meaning and the inaccuracy of the data, failed, however the success of the abuse of process ground proved fatal to the claim. 5RB summarised the decision. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Arizona and Edwards v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm
They also drew on the Federal Court of Appeal decision in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:05 am
Bush and Al Odah v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:10 am
This appeared to be a settled approach and is in line with the approach taken by Henry Carr J in Evalve v Edwards Lifesciences [2019]. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
On 12 March 2020 there was the trial of a preliminary issue in relation to meaning in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon before Nicklin J. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
” Earp v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 6:17 pm
To evoke Lord Sankey’s celebrated phrase in Edwards v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am
As Wikipedia explains, and as I have noted in earlier posts, the requirement of authentication basically means that the proponent of the evidence (the party offering it into evidence) must show that it is what it is claimed to be. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:03 pm
Certainly the use of pen registers is by no means offensive to it. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
” Thayer’s argument was echoed in Justice Edward Douglas White’s concurring opinion in the 1901 decision in Downes v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
Having this bias means that we all tend to assume that people at times past should have known what we now in fact know. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:06 pm
Burwell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:16 am
Kreiner v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
My sense is that if it is to serve any purpose at all, "Elements of Law" must be structured to provide a means of adding coherence to the first year curriculum and its multiple teaching objectives. [read post]
