Search for: "FRAME v FRAME"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 8,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2010, 6:33 am
Bush v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:26 am
She then explores the predicted impact of Obama’s success on the continued protection and enforcement of the Voting Rights Act by using two recent federal court challenges as a frame: Bartlett v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Following Chauvy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
There has been an important focus recently on the effects of governance--the framing instruments and their provisions, that produce effects. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
In its recently-issued Smart v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:26 am
In Jenkins v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
Here are a couple of the findings that were most persuasive (in addition to the fact that I think they specified fixed effects nicely):The effect is more present during the early years, and tends to get "locked in" with experienceThe effect is more present with peers than with supervisory examinersThe effect is more present for examiners who do not telecommute - this, to me, was the best robustness checkExaminers who do not telecommute tended to behave similarly in obviousness (v.… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am
The patents concerned are the same patent family that was successfully challenged before the US Supreme Court in Amgen v Sanofi, which you can read about here from Rose Hughes. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:32 pm
The Chancery Court’s reliance on 102(b)(7) was proper, in the majority’s view, because that was the primary ground on which AbbVie defended the case and the parties framed the issues.The case is No. 239, 2015. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:05 am
Even if the court thinks the plaintiff's rights were violated in hindsight, if the law was not clear at the time, then the plaintiff cannot recover damages.Pay attention to how the Court frames the issue. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 7:08 am
The case is Guthrie v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
The So-Called 10% Rule2) A Response Regarding the 10% Rule3) Situating the Opposition--The Hypocrisy of Misrepresentative GovernmentOn 14th January this year, the Delhi High Court in the case of Imran Ali v Union of India delivered its judgment in the light of a PIL seeking the appointment of an LoP. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:07 pm
They lose.The case is Selevan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:31 am
CARLA BURDETTE v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 10:17 am
Affirmed.Case Name: DONALD GILMER v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Expanding the Frame on June Medical, (2020 Sup. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:50 pm
PSC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 12:50 pm
But then I guess that police officers play by their own rules.The case is People v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:18 pm
Id. at1235 (citing Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:45 pm
The case is Martinez v. [read post]
