Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2022, 4:38 am by Peter J. Sluka
The apparently conflicting outcomes in YMSF and Atlantis can be harmonized. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:44 pm
REV. 887, 900 (1988).[11] See http://www.louisvuitton.com (last visited Sep. 21, 2007).[12] Cartier, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Until recently, the leading decision addressing the provision was the High Court decision in Nova Productions v Mazooma Games. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
Government’s position for the Supreme Court’s review of Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Members shared stories of their committed work on advocating for considered and balanced legislation and judicial outcomes on issues including:  criminal sanctions on design right infringement, experimental use exceptions and patent infringement, the role of IP infringement and the Hague Convention, the interface of competition law under the Competition Act 1998 and the Patents Act, the passing of the IP Bill, Brexit, their input into the relaunch of the IPEC, references to their work in… [read post]
11 May 2022, 6:44 am by Eleonora Rosati
On 26 April 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its long-awaited judgment in Poland v European Parliament and Council (C-401/19). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
   EPLAW was formed in 2001 to strengthen the network of experienced patent litigators in Europe and to work towards a more harmonized European patent litigation system. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 4:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyrightable Subject Matter Kevin Collins, Copyright in Suburbia (Collins is a registered architect as well as a law prof) The stakes: whether © is “working” in suburbia matters in ways that might not be self-evident. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am by Jeremy
This issue that has been debated by copyright experts over the years because, it is argued, the destruction of an artwork may or may not have a negative impact on the reputation of the artist – the test established by Article 6bis of the Berne Convention, and mirrored in most copyright laws in the world, for claiming a violation of the artist’s right of integrity (in the context of Amar Nath Sehgal v Union of India, I commented: “destruction of a work can prejudice an… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
Second, Moulin clarified how the RTBF is the result of the application of long-standing principles of European data protection (national laws that have existed since the 1970s and were harmonized in the Data Protection Directive) and European fundamental rights law, in which freedom of expression has to be balanced with an equally important right to privacy. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am by Ben
  So the CJEU has now said that sampling a sound recording, however short a snippet the sampler takes, needs approval from the copyright owner of the original track and in accordance with the same it held the German Legislation allowing for an exception in the case of sampling as incompatible with the EU law, and it imperative to harmonize this substantive phonogram producers exclusive right irrespective of the fundamental right grounds claimed by the national jurisdiction. [read post]