Search for: "Head v. State" Results 1261 - 1280 of 14,951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm by Linda D. Jellum
 This essay is based on her recent article, Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: Reconciling Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:32 am by Burton A. Padove
The widow of a man killed in a head-on collision in Indiana two years ago is suing the Indiana Department of Transportation, alleging the state agency is liable for her husband’s death, due to its failure to properly maintain the roadway. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 8:50 am by Patrick McGinnis
The court decided that since the adjuster was not designated as a corporate representative and because “prejudice” is a legal term, it would ignore this important admission by the head adjuster that his investigation was not prejudiced by the delay in reporting. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
The justices hold that the ALJs ARE "officers of the United States" for purposes of the Appointments Clause.AND: Another case is Pereira v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 2:24 pm
In my original post, I said that CAAF had granted review in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:42 pm
 Plus has a neat little stateless-citizen-federal-diversity-jurisdiction issue thrown in there for good measure.But I nonetheless can't help thinking that it's the equivalent of an opinion that says that exactly 48.6 angels can fit on an average-size pin manufactured in the eastern seaboard of the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:07 pm
"Juan Alexander Cruz, a three strikes offender, was sentenced to 26.5 years to life in state prison. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
 Because I'm not a moron, and have also been an attorney for a quarter century now, and even I can't fully follow the Ninth Circuit's explanation today as to what it means (or what we have to tell a jury) when we say that someone who ships firearms from one state to another may be acting in "willful"violation of the law.If even someone like me can't fully understand what we're saying, how in God's Green Earth can we expect a jury of laypeople… [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:37 pm
—Twinsectra Limited v Yardley and Others, [2002] UKHL 12, at para. 112. [read post]