Search for: "In Interest of Ac"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am
However, beware, that unlike one in H-1B status who may be able to keep on applying for extensions under AC 21, the shelf life of the L-1A status is 7 years, and 5 years for the L-1B status, as AC21 does not apply to L-1s. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Because of these imprecisions, the use of ACS data fails to capture with any reasonable degree of certainty the population of international LLM graduates, even within the limited population that remains in the US. [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 3:49 am
Acordingly the case was denied summary judgment and the claimant must prove publication in the ordinary way if he wishes to proceed.This is an interesting application of last year's major Internet libel case, Dow Jones v Jameel , [2005] EWCA Civ 75. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:00 am
If you are interested, I have a full copy of the email that went out from MN GreenStar on this issue is located on my site. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Yet despite the increasing solidification of the jurisprudence in this area, these cases leave open some interesting questions. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
I suspect there are other possible solutions and would be interested to hear them. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am
What’s more, Section 608 is identical to Section 18-705 of the Delaware LLC Act, and Courts interpreting that provision have also held that upon the death of a member, the member’s estate becomes an “economic interest holder,” who lacks standing to prosecute derivative claims or to seek dissolution (see Estate of Calderwood v ACE Group Intl. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
Step 5: Is there a public interest served by disclosure to the public? [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
However, disclosures of confidential information which are made in the public interest may avoid liability where a court considers the public interest in maintaining confidence is outweighed by the countervailing public interest in disclosure. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:02 pm
The term ‘Gillick competent’ comes from the case of Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) AC 112. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 pm
In some cases, there might be public interest arguments for alerting the public to a person’s past. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
The concept of what is for the public good or in the public interest or what would be injurious or harmful to the public good or the public interest has varied from time to time. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:07 pm
The analogy is interesting: and gives rise to an additional debate. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
It is interesting to note that Supreme Court made no reference to 2010? [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:11 pm
This is curious because this principle already forms part of English law, having been established 20 years ago in the case of Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534). [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 6:51 am
The clients for the firm include, in addition to Sinner, the ECB (England Cricket Board), Real Madrid football star Jude Bellingham, Serie A side AC Milan, PL side West Ham, Football Australia, and Formula 1’s governing body FIA. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 10:26 pm
The cargo was shipped aboard the mv Giant Ace from East Kalimantan, Indonesia, to Indian ports under 13 bills of lading. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:29 am
In its original application to Strasbourg MGN contested the decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457) that it breached Ms Campbell’s privacy by the publication of an articles in February 2001 in which it divulged details about her drug addiction therapy. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
She maintained that it was not in WSP’s best interests to be vaccinated and that to vaccinate him without her consent would violate her rights under Article 9 ECHR, both alone and when taken together with Article 14, as given effect by the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
