Search for: "In re Bolds"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,852
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 12:33 pm
Further to the March 2015 post on IPBiz [Bold predictions for biofuel production by Joule Unlimited published in BiofuelsDigest on 23 March 2015 ], note that Joule's US Patent 8,986,964 cites as a reference:Statement of Opposition in re European Patent No. 2285948, filed Oct. 8, 2014, on behalf of Algenol Biofuels Switzerland GmbH before the European Patent Office, twenty-nine pages. cited by applicant .Note also2014-12-24 [REG DE R026] OPPOSITION FILED AGAINST PATENT- Ref… [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
We’ve also noticed that, in the two years since Bartlett added the most significant piece to this puzzle, there’s hardly any case law on point – only one decision, In re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 5:44 am
As for any defendant taken into custody because JAMS mistakenly notified the court that the druggie failed to pee into a cup, they’re surely sorry for the inconvenience. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 3:50 am
The capitalization and slight bolding of DGA do not contribute to the mark's commercial impression.Second, the background shape is a simple polygon. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
Every year just after Labor Day, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 9:23 am
If so, this is not so much a bold prediction as a banal recitation of the often-repeated statistic that 90% of all startups fail. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
” But then, in big bold letters toward the bottom (by the QR code that no one has used in the past two years), the flyer says “start here. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:18 pm
Presumably this is intended to be seen as a bold move against censorship – the more accurate “List of things we once published that are now considered to contain irrelevant information about somebody” doesn’t sound as appealing. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
Those cases are discussed below but it bears mention here that Callais’ discussion of them is preceded in its brief by a rather bold argument, the tagline of which is “[i]f the plaintiff has nothing to hide, then he should not object to producing his Facebook records. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:31 am
You’re forgiven, then. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:37 am
– if you didn’t get the bold text for this one, check out the reference in this Wikipedia article: All your base are belong to us. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
“You’re back! [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
They’re not going to leave the hamburger market in New York City alone; don’t you worry about that. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
But what Justice Dwyer did was remarkably bold, maybe even exceptional. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:34 pm
But when they share something, it’s a bold and intimate act. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 10:01 pm
We’re lucky to know where food safety stands in these final days. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:27 pm
This initiative is part of ConnectHome, a bold new program launched by the White House and U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:45 am
” These are bold words from such a senior Ahrar al-Sham official, especially given their appearance so prominently in a U.S. newspaper. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 12:59 pm
Such extensive contact with industry reps, Kesselheim told ProPublica/NPR, can signal less than a best-practice approach to how doctors prescribe drugs; that is, they’re getting information from the companies that make the drugs, not necessarily in equal measure with the impartial science that analyzes them. [read post]
