Search for: "In re Grant"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 33,719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2014, 3:35 pm
The phrase “during the Recess” could modify only “fill up” and simply not apply to “Vacancies that may happen” at all.I would suggest that the clause can plausibly be read to mean: “The President shall have Power during the Recess of the Senate to fill up all Vacancies that may happen, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 12:40 pm
Whether you’re a landowner granting an easement or the holder of an easement, understanding the responsibilities involved is crucial to avoid disputes and ensure proper use of the property. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:48 pm
Needless to say, you're completely devastated.Oh, one more thing. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm
" Today in In re Google, Misc. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:48 am
You have to supply them with a reason for doing what they’re doing. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:20 am
Kosmalski (In re Receivership of 119010 S. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:24 am
” In re Toyota, at 2. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:13 am
Tenenbaum, the Court has entered an order:-criticizing defendant's counsel;-setting firm scheduling dates, including July 20th for a final conference, and July 27th for the trial, and estimating the trial duration at 5 days;-denying plaintiffs' motion to exclude expert witnesses;-allowing plaintiffs a deposition of defendant limited to fair use issues;-allowing defendant written discovery, but no deposition in accordance with defendant's lawyers' statement that they would take no… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is In re Mak (N.D. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:09 am
Together, we're making a real difference for our Great Lakes and we at The Wege Foundation are proud and honored to work with the Coalition on this important cause. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
Sure, they may seek a warrant in circumstances in which they're not positive, or think there's only a twenty percent chance that one will issue. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:39 am
(citing In re Caremark Int’l Deriv. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 am
(In re S.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
The district court agreed that the examiner had “issued a ‘final determination’ in the re-examination proceedings,” and granted Bettcher’s request to exclude the references. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:06 am
The absence of an express provision in the code and the recognition and saving of the inherent power of a court, should not however be treated as a carte blanche to grant any relief. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In In re VEON Ltd. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:33 am
The California Supreme Court last week granted review in Aleman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 11:21 am
" In re Banc of America, at *1. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:52 am
Here is the order list from last Friday. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Texas A&M University, No. 07-1050 (more info) (opinion on improvident grant) (per curiam) This is a real rarity: The Texas Supreme Court's first "improvident grant" since 2003.4 The Texas Supreme Court disposes of most petitions without ever formally granting review. [read post]
