Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
I am happy to announce the publication of an article, "The Emerging Normative Structures of Transnational Law: Non-State Enterprises in Polycentric Asymmetric Global Orders," that appears in the B.Y.U. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
Once communicated, creative content belongs, as a matter of principle, to the public domain. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
The answer, began Mann J, was that it “is a matter of construction of the letter in question” – 10/10 if you wrote that. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 5:47 am by INFORRM
Mann J said that the disclosure order sought went too far and had to be refused. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:47 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds K is for Strike Price L is for Late Filing & Late Payment Penalties [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:49 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
The opposition division held that the invention claimed in claim 1 of the main request then on file was disclosed in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art (Article 100(b) EPC in combination with Article 83 EPC), but that the subject-matter of said claim did not meet the requirements of Article 100(c) EPC in combination with Article 123(2) EPC.The opposition division was of the opinion that priority had been validly… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
In his defence to C&RT’s Part 8 claim, Mr J asserted, so far as is relevant to this appeal: “10. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Schachtman
”8 Whatever the merits of J & J’s procedural ground, its substantive grounds seem dubious. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am by Quinta Jurecic
       (c)  The implementation of Executive Order 13769 has been delayed by litigation. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 1 March, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment in Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v S J & J Monk (a firm). [read post]