Search for: "Marty" Results 1261 - 1280 of 4,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– New York attorney David Munkittrick of Proskauer Rose on the firm’s Privacy Law Blog Courts, Congress Likely to Turn up the Heat on FCC’s Net Neutrality Order – Marc Martin, Marty Stern, and Brendon Fowler of K&L Gates on the firm’s blog, TMT Law Watch Uber, Lyft Decisions Highlight Difficulty of Classifying Workers in the Modern Economy – Del Mar attorney Evan Mix of Sheppard Mullin on the firm’s Labor & Employment Law Blog Marijuana And… [read post]
作者 Jim Butler 和 环球酒店集团® 酒店律师 | 酒店法律博客作者 2015年3月16日点击这里阅读关于残疾人法案(ADA)诉讼代理与合规性文章… [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 6:08 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Minnesota Senators Eaton, Pappas, Dibble, and Marty have just introduced the Minnesota Compassionate Care Act of 2015 (SF 1880). [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 3:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Marty Clear in the Bradenton Herald on the Blurred Lines copying matter:--Thicke and his people probably made a tactical mistake when they filed a "preemptive" suit against Gaye's estate to try to block a plagiarism suit. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:55 am by Sebastian Brady
The President, Jack and Marty agreed, definitely has the authority to make such a deal. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Sebastian Brady
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman argued that there really isn’t a serious question as to the President’s authority to reach a nuclear agreement with Iran, given that the agreement is probably going to be non-binding under international law. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:37 am by Jack Goldsmith
” However, in my post with Marty Lederman, I also noted that “an entirely different set of arguments and concerns might come into play if the parties were to sign a non-binding agreement that becomes the basis for a legally binding Security Council Resolution. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:33 pm
Jack Goldsmith (Harvard) and Marty Lederman (Georgetown) in a very interesting post at Just Security. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:18 pm
Marty Lederman (Georgetown): [S]uch communications by legislators with foreign officials — including communications with our adversaries, and sometimes expressing views contrary to those of the Executive branch — are nothing new. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:05 am by Jack Goldsmith
If, as Marty and I just argued, the deal with Iran is a non-binding agreement under international law, then, as we stated, “there is little doubt about the President’s constitutional authority to make the deal on his own. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:38 am by Jack Goldsmith
In Marty’s post yesterday about the letter that 47 Senators sent to “the Leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he briefly addressed the question of “whether the President has the constitutional authority to complete the agreement in question without further congressional involvement. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Charles Sartain
Lagniappe Here is a link to an excellent presentation by Marty to the Energy Law Section of the Houston Bar Association. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by m zamora
Schulte II of Clarkson University in Potsdam, N.Y. for providing his expertise in DNA barcode testing for this investigation.The case is being handled by Executive Deputy Attorney General Marty Mack and Assistant Attorney General Deanna Nelson with the assistance of NYAG’s thirteen regional offices. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
The first, emphasized by Marty Lederman, holds that any ambiguities in interpretation of the law should resolved in favor of the government in order to adhere to the Supreme Court’s rule that federal statutes must be construed to avoid interpretations that upset “the usual balance” between federal and state power. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman discusses and addresses Justice Kennedy’s concerns about coercion, while elsewhere at Balkinization, Brianne Gorod suggests that, “[a]lthough most of the questions that Justice Alito asked were critical of the government’s position, one actually helps demonstrate why the government should prevail. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Frederic Marty has a new paper (in French) on Airports, Low Cost Carriers, and State Aids : a Two-sided Market Perspective. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm by Guest Blogger
(The post also references Professor Gluck’s January 27 Politico article summarizing  that argument, and Professor Marty Lederman’s March 2 post on Balkinization to similar effect.)The gist of their argument is that:                “We’re not afraid to acknowledge Gluck’s . . . federalism argument; we just think it’s wrong on the merits. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:56 am by Marty Lederman
’”  Bond slip op. at 12 (quoting Gregory, 501 U.S. at 460).The Galen Institute attorneys write:  "Georgetown’s Marty Lederman asserted on the Balkinization blog yesterday that 'the challengers entirely ignore' the federalism argument. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:27 am
” Similarly, Georgetown’s Marty Lederman asserted on the Balkinization blog yesterday that “the challengers entirely ignore” the federalism argument. [read post]