Search for: "Matter of David B." Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2016, 6:30 am by Karen Tani
Air Force as a separate military branch-a B-29 Superfortress crashed on a test run, killing the plane's crew. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
Perhaps it’s because the Statement of Claim is the first shot fired by David vs. the large Goliath on the receiving end of the claim. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
Perhaps it’s because the Statement of Claim is the first shot fired by David vs. the large Goliath on the receiving end of the claim. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
The letter for publication reflected the matters addressed in the open letter that prompted Dr. [read post]
The result of this invidious doctrine, as formulated in Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168, meant that “if two people set out to commit an offence (crime A), and in the course of that joint enterprise, one of them (D1) commits another offence (crime B), the second person (D2) is guilty as an accessory to crime B if he has foreseen the possibility that D1 might act as he did. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
The district court rejected that position as a matter of law, as do we. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lemley: innovation often goes along w/having to take a license b/c of patent threats. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
David Hyman & David Franklyn A couple of small empirical studies and armchair empiricism; lots of regulatory interest. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
The Ghost in the Machine As MTP readers will recall, a Silicon Valley lawyer named Renata B. [read post]
Were the appellant’s administrative detention from 3 April until 6 June 2012 and the bail restrictions imposed upon him until 2 January 2013 unlawful by reason of the matters raised in questions (1) to (5) above? [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
By guest blogger David Silverman [Eric’s intro: this blog post helps distill Judge Koh’s two rulings, In re Anthem Inc. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:56 am by David Post
” The question in the case is, rather, “how does what the state did here relate to (a) the authority of parents over their children, (b) the power of the state to protect the well-being of children, and (c) the constitutional protection for ‘the freedom of speech’? [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
§ 1400(b) provides that a corporate defendant in a patent case—like corporate defendants in nearly all other types of cases—may be sued in any district in which personal jurisdiction lies. [read post]