Search for: "Michigan v. Long" Results 1261 - 1280 of 2,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Newman Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in granting habeas relief and applying the "reasonable speculation" rule, when the Michigan state court had applied the Jackson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:38 pm
This case seems to fall between Michigan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:05 am by Rich McHugh
Citing the 1996 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Verity Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Opinion below (Michigan Court of Appeals) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-1131 Title: Phon v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:45 pm
EPA's Region V requesting justification for changes made to the State's air pollution control plan. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
In Schuette v Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Regents of the University of Michigan (Dkt No 12-682), the Supreme Court will review an en banc Sixth Circuit decision that a voter-approved ban on government affirmative action in the state of Michigan, as it applies to race-conscious admissions policies in public colleges and universities, violated the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
 Further, as Justice Kagan explained in another case from last term (Michigan v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:31 am by Lorene Park
According to a Michigan Court of Appeals, employees cannot be denied unemployment benefits solely on this basis. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:57 am
Lund (University of Southern California), on Tuesday, January 11, 2022 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983), does not apply to a summary order. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Two Michigan cases in 2003, Gratz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:16 am by Todd Henderson
” He was referring, among other cases, to the court’s recent decision in Michigan v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]