Search for: "Miller v. State of California"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2014, 8:40 am
Por el contrario, en el campo de la obscenidad, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos en Miller v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Miller, Patrick J. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
id=13796&deptid=5 (stating that the PTO announced a 54% allowance rate). n19. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:50 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Litig. 845 (Summer 2009) Michael Isaac Miller, The Class Action (Un)Fairness Act Of 2005: Could It Spell The End Of The Multi-State Consumer Class Action? [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Litig. 845 (Summer 2009) Michael Isaac Miller, The Class Action (Un)Fairness Act Of 2005: Could It Spell The End Of The Multi-State Consumer Class Action? [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:15 am
” No doubt few will argue that Arthur’s content fails to meet the criteria for obscenity under Miller v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:47 pm
Supreme Court struck down California's attempt to prosecute older molestation cases. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) · Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law · … [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
Since 1973, however, the Court has adhered to a three-part test it set forth in Miller v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 8:51 am
California (1973). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Making a Decision at the Dairy Case, Farmers’ Market, or on the Farm As described in Part 1, there is considerable variation from state-to-state in the way raw dairy products are regulated in the US. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
If a student writes on an exam at a state school that the First Amendment doesn't apply to the states, the student gets a bad grade. [read post]
