Search for: "Moore v. Circuit Court"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm
Judge Kimberly Moore highlighted this issue in her recent dissent from the court's denial of en banc rehearing of Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:16 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Third, the Court followed the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Thomas v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:56 am
As in the past, the Federal Circuit has again expressly declined an invitation to revisit its 1998 en banc holding in Cybor Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
Judge Moore (joined by CJ Rader) and Judge O’Malley both argued the court should. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm
Retractable Technologies et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Note the dissents.From the dissent of Judge Moore, joined by CJ Rader:see also Wegner, H.C., Arlington Indus. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
(which was originally decided by the City of Richmond Circuit Court) and essentially ask the Supreme Court of Virginia to uphold the Circuit Court's ruling.I support my friend and since I represent employees in non-compete cases, I heartily support his argument in this case.As the Circuit Court ruling summarizes,"This action arises from Moore and Donna Perkinson's decision to voluntarily terminate their employment… [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
Once again, this was a Supreme Court reversal of a Ninth Circuit habeas grant. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:44 pm
Judge Moore and Judge Kethledge fought both a legal battle and a snark battle in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:53 am
According to that opinion (by Circuit Judge Moore), the United States has "no right to police Chinese business practices. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:43 am
Motors Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
Prometheus The Court will hear argument in Mayo v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
Oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States was held in Florence v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 203.10[2][a], at 14 (3d ed. 2005)).In this case, the district court entered an order ex- pressly denying Bosch’s motion for entry of a permanent injunction. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:57 pm
Supreme Court ruling, Penry v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85… [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit declared the public recording of police to be a basic, vital, and well-established liberty, the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois is now fighting to preserve that freedom in ACLU v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:33 am
More: ACLU information on ACLU v. [read post]
