Search for: "Newman, Appeal of" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
The panel, consisting of Judges Prost, Newman and Lourie, expressed concern that Boies was seeking to reinstate such a large jury award based on these few, incidental acts of infringement that were proven only circumstantially. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
The panel, consisting of Judges Prost, Newman and Lourie, expressed concern that Boies was seeking to reinstate such a large jury award based on these few, incidental acts of infringement that were proven only circumstantially. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
  On appeal here, the Federal Circuit has reversed. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:40 pm
  Procedural HistorySanofi-Aventis (“Sanofi”) appeals the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“the Board”),2 awarding priority of invention to Pfizer Inc. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
&Assocs., Inc., 330 F.3d 991, 998 (7th Cir. 2003)Judge Newman's dissent begins:I would reverse the district court’s judgment and holdthat Sunovion’s clinical trial does not constitute an invalidating“public use” of Dey’s invention. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:13 pm
My colleagues on this panel object to the intrusion of the Constitution into this appeal, Maj. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:30 am by Dennis Crouch
Judge Newman Concurred-in-Part – arguing that the civil action should not give deference to PTO factual determinations. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Judge Newman advanced a third approach, and held that all the claims were patentable subject matter. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:46 pm
  As some may know, since September 2008, I have periodically nominated various people who I thought would make a good choice for the next PTO Director, including (in no particular order) Stephen Kunin, Gary Griswold, Judge Pauline Newman and Paul Kaminiski. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:05 pm by Rantanen
Litigation Must Be Reasonably ForseeableThe resolution of the two appeals turned on the issue of when litigation became "reasonably forseeable," thus triggering Rambus's duty to preserve evidence. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 1:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ongoing damages: The appellate panel did not consider the issue of ongoing damages (compulsory license) because that question was not appealed. [read post]