Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 1261 - 1280 of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
The President of the Russian Federation reminds us that Empires, like the United States and China, may not have the luxury of such exuberant introspection except at great cost. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
The Court's decision in Loving v Virginia says nothing to the contrary regarding original understanding. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:13 am by CMS
Examining the language used by Parliament, the Court of Appeal noted that Group 3 of Schedule 8 VATA is comprised of similar Items (e.g., newspapers, books, booklets, maps, etc.) and held that the words used within each Item and in the notes to that provision must be read and interpreted together. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:20 am by emagraken
 The BC Court of Appeal rejected this argument and in doing so provided the following useful reminder of the limits of the forseeability defence: [71] It is not necessary for the plaintiff to show that the precise injury or the full extent of the injury was reasonably foreseeable. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm by Barry Sookman
The information itself is not private — it is communicated precisely so that it will be communicated to others. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm by Barry Sookman
The information itself is not private — it is communicated precisely so that it will be communicated to others. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:08 am by Florian Mueller
For an example, in its German infringement actions against Daimler, Nokia argues that only an end product--in that case, a car--implements a standard, but car makers purchase telematics control units (TCUs) that, in turn, come with connectivity modules (often called network access devices, or NADs), and the NADs actually are like a complete phone, just without a screen, and cars add absolutely nothing that is required to practice the standard.Even if the debate is about chipsets… [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Ritalin) were the “gold standard” in the treatment of ADHD. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:43 am by Bexis
We found the decision in Mills v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Congress intended to depart from that era by defining the scope of foreign sovereign immunity through the FSIA, standardizing sovereign immunity determinations, and leaving those determinations to the courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:55 am by Eric Segall
Her standard for abortion was whether the government was placing an "undue burden" in the way of women seeking abortions. [read post]