Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 17,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
The main judgment was given by Lord Sumption. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
The main judgment was given by Lord Sumption. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:02 am
In Cassell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Supreme Court did not share those sentiments in McIntyre v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:39 pm
Monat Global Corp. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
District Court for the District of Minnesota (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
This announcement caught many people’s attention. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
In the case of Ion Cârstea v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
” (People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
Case citation: Goldline, LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:20 pm
See NAACP v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The summary given on hand down (given by Lord Sumption) is here: Lords Wilson and Kerr, dissenting, took view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 5:27 am
People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
The Plessy v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, well over half a million people are unhoused on any given night in America. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:15 am
The court made it clear in Packington v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am
In Lone Wolf v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
The court based its findings on, among other evidence, two expert reports and it found that Terentyev had negatively influenced public opinion “with the aim of inciting social hatred and enmity, escalating social conflict and controversy in society and awakening base instincts in people”, calling for the “physical extermination” of police officers by ordinary people. [read post]
