Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 4,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2014, 11:54 pm
It also means that a large group of people that either couldn’t afford the dentist teeth-whitening prices or didn’t want to pay them, can have white teeth. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:04 pm
The Law Office of Brian V. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:36 am
* Neeley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:08 pm
Redhail, and Turner v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am
It was used, for example, during the McCarthy period, when private parties blacklisted people for fear of being thought communist sympathizers. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:53 am
* Biro v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm
A pair of favored examples are Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants, aka “The Hot Coffee Case,” and Pearson v Chung, or “The Pants Lawsuit. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am
That’s what Golan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:30 pm
In fact, recent decisions like FTC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:47 am
One of the reasons attaching a price tag to people is distasteful in this context is that we all want to believe that social media is always about personal relationships, not deliberate, targeted marketing. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:32 pm
Many of us applauded, rightfully so, when AALL refused money from TRL last summer for refusing to participate in the Price Index. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:55 am
Afterward, the seller offered to sell Xerox additional property worth $5,800 for the price of only $600. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:06 am
Silicon Valley, or Cupertino v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 11:10 am
See County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 5:59 am
Ewert v. eBay, Inc., 2010 WL 4269259 (N.D. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Shack and Jacques v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
Price, 364 U. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
" Judge William Ray Price Jr. asked if the caps violate the right to equal protection of the law. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
So said the lessor-plaintiffs in Walker v. [read post]