Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 178,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2021, 11:02 am
The dismissal of plaintiff’s case was upheld. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The Trial Court granted Town & Country’s motion the same day it was filed. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
The plaintiffs argued the District Court correctly found that the CAFA’s local controversy exception applied in this case, and therefore, remand was appropriate. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 4:24 pm
The plaintiff’s husband was driving the vehicle, which was solely registered in the plaintiff’s name. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 10:50 am
According to the court’s written opinion, the plaintiff’s husband died when he was driving his Ford truck and swerved to avoid an accident with a high school student who had pulled out in front of him. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 5:38 am
" Justice Alito's dissent notes "The defendant might hand the plaintiff a certified check or deposit the requisite funds in a bank account in the plaintiff ’s name. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
" Here, Plaintiff alleges, in conclusory fashion, that Defendants "[stalked] [Plaintiff's] social media via. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:52 am
The service on plaintiff’s insurance carrier occurred two years after the accident, but plaintiff’s suit naming the defendant driver had been filed within the one-year statute of limitations. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:58 pm
Every Cowboys fan - and every Texan - is now a plaintiff in a lawsuit for damages suffered because of the bad call in last Sunday's game between the Dallas Cowboys and the Green Bay Packers. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Plaintiff's college friends "cancelled him. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:20 am
" As a result, the Rubin plaintiffs-appellants say that this "decision not to insist upon documentation—or to ignore and discard the documentation that they received—opens them to recapture by the property’s rightful owner or, as in this case, another party that claims a primary statutory interest. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:28 pm
In today’s case (Park v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:20 am
§ 285 and for sanctions under Rule 11 and awarded $222,937 jointly and severally against plaintiff and plaintiff's attorneys. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
The court’s decision reviewed a lower court’s decision to prevent the plaintiffs’ expert witness from testifying. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:15 am
On July 29, 2015, the plaintiff’s doctor cleared him to return to work with no restrictions, and the plaintiff returned to work that same day. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:18 am
"As noted, in the event the plaintiff is neither a public official nor a public figure, but the defendant's statements relate to a matter of public concern, the plaintiff must show that the alleged defamatory statements are false.The full text of the decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.ca6.uscourts.gov] [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:46 am
”As noted, in the event the plaintiff is neither a public official nor a public figure, but the defendant’s statements relate to a matter of public concern, the plaintiff must show that the alleged defamatory statements are false. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:11 pm
“That’s half the reason I took the case! [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:53 pm
A Wal-Mart surveillance camera caught the plaintiff’s fall on video. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:16 am
City of New York (2d Cir. 2006), when the plaintiff was forcibly hospitalized based on the mistaken assumption that his Lou Gehrig's disease rendered him incompetent to grant or withhold consent to hospitalization. [read post]
