Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
DeLuca v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
The point of departure in the argument in Egbert v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
Related posts: Kiobel–The Plot Thickens New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed Keitner on Kiobel and the future of the Alien Tort Statute [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am
” The Court reminded itself of the high threshold for a mandatory, rather than prohibitory injunction, of a ‘strong prima facie case’, via Francis V Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2003] 1 WLR 2248, then went on to the criteria for the exercise of the discretion to accommodate pending appeal in R v Camden London Borough Council ex parte Mohammed [1997] 30 HLR 315. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
Both Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 5:08 am
Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp., August 16, 2019, Paez, R.). [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
” In Prawfsblog, Jack Preis discusses Manuel v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:22 am
Crown Royal Ventures, LLC, which I discussed here. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:35 pm
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989); United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:57 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 24/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
The most recent unsolicited solicitor-general amicus brief was filed in Royal v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
In July 2017, a review of modern working practices was commissioned by the then Prime Minister, Theresa May, and chaired by Matthew Taylor, former Chief Adviser on Strategy to Tony Blair when he was Prime Minister and subsequently CEO of the Royal Society of Arts. [read post]
