Search for: "Sells v. State" Results 1261 - 1280 of 14,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 9:00 am by Christine Nielsen
On 21 November, in Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd [2012] UKSC 55, the UK Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals' order for the disclosure of the identities of individuals who had used an online ticketing website to sell and purchase international rugby tickets at inflated prices in breach of the Rugby Football Union’s (RFU) ticket terms and conditions. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:44 am by Christine Hurt
")  Without stating the obvious, craigslist is a privately-held company; it cannot be subject to a hostile takeover as long as Jim and Craig don't sell their shares. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 8:09 am by Adam Gana
’written notice to the member with which he is associated describing in detail the proposed transaction and the person’s proposed role therein and stating whether he has received or may receive selling compensation in connection with the transaction. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
Sale of a Business, thenLicense AgreementTrademarkGoodwillGeographically Bounded Rights to TrademarksTrade DressBreach of ContractLouisiana LawAn attempt to simultaneously sell a restaurant and license associated intellectual property has led to ten years of litigation in state and federal court.The Bill of Sale has a choice of law provision stating it is “governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Louisiana. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am by Andrew Lustigman
Here, a data mining company, IMS collected prescription drug prescriber information to sell to drug companies to ascertain what drugs particular doctors were prescribing. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
He falsely stated that he was unmarried, was in the process of selling a different house, and was not obligated to pay child support. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:58 pm
” It might seem obvious that here in Oregon, in Washington or anywhere else in the country companies have an obligation to ensure that the products they sell are safe and function properly, but manufacturers of unsafe medical devices gained unprecedented liability protection via the Supreme Court’s 2008 Riegel v Medtronic case. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:04 pm by Ronald Mann
In an unusual twist, though, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]