Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 157,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2010, 7:21 am
The Volokh Conspiracy: “Several readers asked me why United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 6:29 am
On February 26, 2014, the Supreme Court decided Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 8:21 am
Check out our newest collection at C|M|Law library: Terry v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:51 am
A case called State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 8:12 am
The State Supreme Court recently issued an important decision concerning New Jersey employment law. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 11:54 am
Adam Lamparello (Indiana Tech - Law School) has posted Riley v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Trump, it is, as the caption of the Supreme Court's decision unwittingly states: Trump v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:57 am
Housing authority need not state the obvious that the offer is final Omar v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:00 am
Rev. (2023): On March 19, 2018, the State of Mississippi enacted a law prohibiting abortions after fifteen... [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
Desrosiers v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
Chief Constable of Humberside Police and Others v Information Commissioner, Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening Court of Appeal “There could be no question of the retention of records of old minor convictions being held in the national police computer to be either excessive or being held for longer than necessary. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 10:03 am
Isla Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm
CAAF heard oral argument last week in the Article 62 appeal case of United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:41 am
Professors Naomi Cahn & June Carbone, on the GWU Law Review blog: At the core of the Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
Plaintiffs’ Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001), a state law claim is impliedly preempted if it does not implicate a traditional state law tort principle and exists solely by virtue of a federal statute. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:26 am
Criminal Procedure Reopen and amend provisions This appeal is about a "reopen-and-amend" provision of a plea agreement, a phrase coined by prior Wisconsin case law referring to those plea bargains where the State and defendant agree that a judgment of conviction, once announced, will be amended by the State upon the happening of some future event. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:43 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:24 pm
Keitner (Univ. of California - Hastings College of the Law) has posted an ASIL Insight on Germany v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) in Weisfelner v. [read post]
