Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 1261 - 1280 of 26,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am by Amy Howe
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:50 am by Matrix Law
The Appellant is a Palestinian refugee currently living in Lebanon, having fled the conflict in Syria. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 12:23 pm
when I read this snippet from a report about Live Earth: Given a choice of four major issues before the United States today, 36% named the war in Iraq as most important. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
” We live under what he calls “liberalocratic despotism,” in which the “liberal state expands to control nearly every aspect of life. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:03 am by Burton A. Padove
Two months later, mother filed a motion to relocate, seeking permission to move across state to be closer to her parents and asking that her boyfriend be allowed to live with her. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:03 am by Burton A. Padove
Two months later, mother filed a motion to relocate, seeking permission to move across state to be closer to her parents and asking that her boyfriend be allowed to live with her. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  The press doesn’t like us having private lives and the government doesn’t like judges making decisions it disagrees with. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:00 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Oscar Longoria has filed HB 1790, which would allow state jail felons who successfully complete probation to have their convictions reduced to a class A misdemeanor.The bill, which excludes assaults and other "crimes against persons" (Title V of the Penal Code) will help alleviate state jail populations, reduce prisoner healthcare costs and encourage state jail defendants to take probation terms seriously, including restitution for victims. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:49 pm by Gregory Forman
In a highly anticipated case that generated much local notoriety, and in which some of my friends and colleagues participated, the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in the case of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]