Search for: "State v. State Racing Commission" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
GMBH v Geox SPA (PatLit) (Gray on Claims) EWHC (Pat): PPDs and piecemeal litigation: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: When anticompetition spices up competition, greyhounds lose their appeal: Bookmakers’ Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd & Ors v Amalgamated Racing & Ors (IPKat) LOCOG demands Olympic Removals stop using Olympic symbol (IPKat) Infringing goods in transit: are patents more efficacious than trade… [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:28 am by Antti Ruokonen
  The Allied Control Commission supervised compliance with the treaty. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am by John Floyd
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
 For that reason, the Court has often stood with the least popular in our society and, since Marbury v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
There has been much more legislative action at the state level, however, particularly in conservative states. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Because many Nader voters would have voted for Gore had Nader not been in the race, and the pickup of these Nader voters would have given Gore more states. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Nicholas R. Parrillo
Indeed, many have argued that the aspiration of Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm by Michael Geist
The Commission is supposed to determine what is needed to qualify for an exemption from final offer arbitration. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 10:34 pm by Leland E. Beck
  At least the Federal Election Commission (FEC) provided a small amount of relief. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by INFORRM
But in the race for headlines, they missed the real point. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Before this amendment, this was the list of protected characteristics under state anti-discrimination law, but the adjective “biological” was added.)The new law expressly preempts all local laws, practices, and policies that provide protection against discrimination beyond what is protected at the state level.The new law charges the state’s Human Relations Commission with enforcement of the statewide antidiscrimination rules and requires it to… [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]