Search for: "Stevens v. Marks" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” [This became painfully evident in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Our view stands in marked contrast to the view expressed by defenders of originalism and textualism. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
The lead legislative sponsor of the marriage bills, Mark Leno of San Francisco, argued that based on the way it was sold to the people in 2000 and the way it was codified by the state in the part of the statute books devoted to recognition of out-of-state marriages, Proposition 22 should be interpreted to deal solely with the question of recognition of out-of-state marriages, thereby leaving it open to the legislature to enact his bill, which amended a different section of the state's… [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Mark Graber, A Modest Proposal (Oct. 11, 2006)21. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am by Victoria Kwan
From July 19 to 23, Justice Alito, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and retired Justice John Paul Stevens participated in a New York University Law School conference in Barcelona, Spain. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) TZ 2 SP33 2011 Civil Rights With all deliberate speed : implementing Brown v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Jordan Furlong
Law Firm Investment Portfolios built on Ron and Toby’s work, a post by V. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Ramsey: consider TM implications of the mark. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
For the reasons outlined above in my analysis of Grant v Todorovic (supra) I do not feel that this is such a case. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]