Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
State Water Contractors v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 2:13 pm
The new United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Interim Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility was published on 16 December 2014 to replace the Guidance of March 2014. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
” Wall Street Journal (Nov. 6, 2002). [2] Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 4:17 am
United States In Ratzlaf v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
(Note also that the article thanks law student “Bryan V. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
“In passing and enforcing Amendment 64,” the lawsuit said, “the state of Colorado has created a dangerous gap in the federal drug control measures enacted by the United States Congress. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:08 am
McNeely, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:21 pm
Portions bear quoting at some length: The criminal justice system in the United States today bears little relationship to what the Founding Fathers contemplated, what the movies and television portray, or what the average American believes. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:01 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:55 am
Various Items of Drug Paraphernalia; United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
Gerstein, who served as the elected chief prosecutor from 1956-1977), know that the "first" Drug Court in Florida, and in the United States, opened in the MJB in 1989. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
The AP story and link were fakes, and had been designed by the FBI to mimic the appearance and feel of a genuine AP article. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
That person, if the United States is right, has committed a criminal offense, because she structured cash transactions “for the specific purpose of depriving the Government of the information that Section 5313(a) is designed to obtain. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
As Missouri v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In a prominent legal challenge to the Food and Drug Administration’s proposed tobacco warnings, for instance, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia displayed a form of literalism in responding to these warnings. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Jane BambauerFor the conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First AmendmentThis is Part Two of a two-part post on the First Amendment issues raised in United States v. [read post]
