Search for: "United States v. Clarke" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2010, 7:57 am by Adam Wagner
This could ultimately cost the UK a lot of money in compensation payments, although it is of note that the court has did not award compensation in Hirst or the more recent case of Frodl v Austria, The coalition government will be wary of the European Court of Human Rights’ recently acquired new powers to punish intransigent states. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Any improvement, Stearns says, will come from the USDA, FDA, and United States legislature. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Food-related Illness and Death in the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:05 am by Carter Wood
Goodyear Tire was a shot heard around the United States business community. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:49 pm
” So observed Lord Clarke recently, in delivering the unanimous judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in RTS Flexible Systems [“RTS”] v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:43 am by Steve Sady
In its detailed elaboration of constitutional avoidance in Clark v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I was reminded of all this by Francis Pileggi's post on a recent Delaware case, Hampshire Group, Limited v. [read post]