Search for: "United States v. Williams" Results 1261 - 1280 of 6,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 2:18 pm by Ilya Somin
Seattle (2007) (severely limiting affirmative action programs in primary and secondary schools); Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Religion has won a number of victories recently at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am by Peter Margulies
As a measure of the historic rigor accompanying such agreements, prior to the Trump administration, the United States's only safe third country agreement was with Canada, a country whose rule-of-law institutions resemble those of the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
If any part of the act be unconstitutional, the provisions of that part may be disregarded while full effect will be given to such as are not repugnant to the constitution of the United States or of the state or to the ordinance of 1787. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:49 pm by Stephen Wermiel
On July 24, the justices ruled 8-0 in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
United States, which discussed reasons for a less strict adherence to the court’s past decisions, as an example of a theory deserving of addition scholarly and legal scrutiny. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
United States A judge has ruled that Rep. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Yesterday’s decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is the latest twist in Michael Flynn’s prosecution for lying to federal agents about his contacts with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:20 am by Cameron Kerry, John B Morris, Jr.
Editor’s Note: This article is part of a three-part Lawfare series on how to address federal privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
§ 541, which provides in blanket terms that “[e]ach United States attorney is subject to removal by the President. [read post]