Search for: "Ward v. State" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
  United States On 13 June 2023, the Texas Governor signed HB4 to make Texas the tenth state to have a comprehensive privacy law. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am by Edward Hartnett
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am by New Books Script
KF 388 W24 2011 Walker & Walker’s English legal system / Richard Ward, Amanda Akhtar. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 Their cabinet resolved to seek the Secretary of State’s approval which was forthcoming. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:26 pm by Josh Blackman
FedSoc pumps out ideologues to push judges right-ward as clerks, those clerks become judges, the next set of clerks push them right-ward. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm by INFORRM
  It is arguable that Article 10 places the state under a positive obligation to provide such access. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]