Search for: "Biggers v. State" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The former catcher alleges West gave pitcher Bill Wagner a bigger strike zone in exchange for letting the umpire borrow a vintage car. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:06 am by Tom Smith
The worst thing would be a hung election, with respect to control of the Senate, for example, like the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In his dissent from denial of cert earlier this year in Silvester v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by Aaron Tang
But the bigger lesson of these cases lies elsewhere. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:18 am by JP Zanders
As an ‘agency’, the IABS would presumably be department or administrative unit of a bigger entity. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from a case called Richey v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 8:11 am by Andrew Delaney
Doggie Freakout DevicesGreen Mountain Fireworks v. [read post]
That is, for Mueller to give Flynn a deal of this sort, the prosecutor must believe he is building a case against a bigger fish still. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:11 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
  While what is technically left for the Court to review in the latest iteration of Fisher v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But even if the proponents are correct about this first point under federal remedies law (and some may argue that the Ninth Circuit cases don’t mean what I think they do), the bigger problem for the proponents is their second assertion—that Judge Walker’s order in fact does not go beyond the named plaintiffs. [read post]