Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 1281 - 1300 of 48,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
So held the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its May 11, 2016 decision in Headley v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Simon Gibbs
I mentioned the other day the case of Faidi v Elliott Corporation [2012] EWCA Civ 287 and the failure of the parties to consider mediation in a dispute over a wooden floor. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:56 am
Sinclair v Glatt and others [2009] EWCA Civ 176; [2009] WLR (D) 97 “A receiver appointed pursuant to s 77 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to get in the assets of a convicted money launderer was entitled to recover his remuneration, costs and expenses from the realisable assets caught by the order. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 7:46 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Ferreira v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm by Igor Nikolic
The Huawei v ZTE case provided a framework for good-faith negotiation, and courts of the EU member states have become accustomed to evaluating the conduct of both parties. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:25 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On March 5, a three judge panel of the Superior Court ruled in Safe Auto v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
County awarded attorney fees and costs as the prevailing party in a civil rights actionCarter v Village of Ocean Beach, USCA, 2nd Circuit, #13,815Plaintiffs, former seasonal and part-time police officers of the Village of Ocean Beach, sued the Village and County and various officers and employees of those entities alleging multiple wrongful termination and defamation. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:43 am by sally
This scheme provides detailed rules for costs management, including the provision and approval of costs budgets, and is indicative of the approach propounded by Lord Justice Jackson in his Final Report on Civil Litigation Costs. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 11:55 am
   The unsuccessful moving party resisted an order of costs on the basis that it was reasonable for it to have brought the motion. [read post]