Search for: "Does 1 through 10, inclusive"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2013, 5:25 am
The Appellate Division annulled the Board’s determination with respect to Teacher’s seniority for the purposes of layoff and it was directed to award seniority credit to her for her service between November 6, 2006 through and including February 10, 2010, and directed the District to reinstate her to her position as a full-time probationary teacher in the foreign language tenure area with back pay and benefits. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
These acts or remarks are punishable by law and the fact that they were made using a virtual channel does not make less punishable those who committed them and whose case made be tried by courts. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:16 pm
These acts or remarks are punishable by law and the fact that they were made using a virtual channel does not make less punishable those who committed them and whose case made be tried by courts. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 7:55 pm
Pure and simple, mandatory funding for a variety of organic programs written into the 2008 farm bill didn’t qualify for automatic inclusion into the farm bill extension. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
The Registry does not seem to recognize the theory and permits registration of colours only in combinations.Rupkatha argues that the inclusive definition of trademark under Section 2(1)(zb) of the TM Act, 1999 includes unconventional marks such as single colour. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Now, I'm not sure when a claim "occurs" and whether this new subsection should have read "any loss occurring", but this new subsection does seems to be temporally limited to claims "occurring from October 26, 2012 through November 15, 2012". [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Now, I'm not sure when a claim "occurs" and whether this new subsection should have read "any loss occurring", but this new subsection does seems to be temporally limited to claims "occurring from October 26, 2012 through November 15, 2012". [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
Still, the search for a RR threshold for general causation does have some basis in the practice of epidemiology. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
McGraw and State Farm Ins., GD 10-16523 (C.P. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
McGraw and State Farm Ins., GD 10-16523 (C.P. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:30 am
How does the proposal support families? [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:59 am
TABLE 1: SUPREME COURT REVERSALS OF LOWER COURT DECISIONS BY TERM AND CIRCUIT (2005 – 2011) 1. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 8:41 am
Another example of a more progressive statement is para 1 the DAG’s Guiding Principles: ‘The adoption of the Development Agenda (DA) at the General Assembly of the World Intellectual Property (WIPO) in 2007 was a milestone in achieving the historic aspiration of developing countries for a paradigm shift in the international perspective of intellectual property (IP): a shift from viewing IP as an end in itself, to viewing it as a means to serve the… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:00 am
Within the EU: 12 include, 4 express exclude, 10 say natural persons (presumed exclusion), 1 x 30-year limit. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
It’s gained new prominence because of its inclusion in the TDRA; many have a favorable attitude towards it as a counterpart to classic fair use. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
"1. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 1:11 am
It does not, for example, offer an integrated Hindley-Milner polymorphic type system. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
(C) On walls of Existing Buildings, by allowing a projection into a required yard, setback or other required open area, provided that the projection does not exceed 10 inches and does not occupy more than 20% of the surface area of the wall (as viewed in elevation). [read post]
