Search for: "English v. English"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 9,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2021, 4:00 am
Ojanen v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
Although a defamatory publication is actionable without proof of either intention or special damage in English law it must be shown that a “substantial tort” has been committed (see and Lait v Evening Standard [2011] EWCA Civ 859). [read post]
27 May 2016, 7:00 am
The claims were brought against the Ministry of Defence in the English courts. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
Joseph V. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 2:07 am
Relying on the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:25 am
In Beltran v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am
From 2005 English language proficiency was required for citizenship. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
The IP High Court of Japan said in its judgment on FRAND issues in the 2014 Apple v Samsung case (English translations of the judgments are available here) that relatively few public opinions (invited by the court, as reported earlier in IPKat) suggested that the court should apply the Antimonopoly Act. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:23 pm
Jakob v. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 12:24 pm
(Equilon Enterprises v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:23 pm
Jakob v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
Lyle covered the decision for this blog, Mark Walsh provided a “View from the Courtroom,” and I covered the decision in Plain English. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
There is no presumption in English law that exemption clauses do not apply to fundamental breaches. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:16 am
USCIS, Sept. 4, 2024 - "This notice is to tell you about a proposed Settlement Agreement of a class action lawsuit, J.O.P. et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Jessica McGaw v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:00 am
Basanti v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:55 am
The case is Petrodel Resources Ltd & Ors v Prest & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 1395. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:56 am
Tinker v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:26 pm
(v) Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:45 am
The opinion in Rodriguez v. [read post]
