Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 30,467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2023, 9:41 pm
” The appeals court distinguished this case from Johnson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:49 pm
Ragingwire In Ross v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:47 pm
OpenAI relies on the precedent set in Authors Guild v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am
The obligation to provide natural justice, on the other hand, manifests in a preoccupation with planning for and managing the arbitration process itself, and ensuring the perception and reality of the fairness of the proceeding. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:50 pm
The Court affirmed the lower court’s ruling stating generally that the ordinance was reasonable and fair relative to its legislative goals. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[1] The FAR defines cost analysis as “the review and evaluation of any of the separate cost elements and profit or fee in an offeror’s or contractor’s proposal as needed to determine a fair and reasonable price or to determine cost realism…. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 6:54 am
Pinto v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm
From a memorandum supporting a motion to permanently seal the entire case in Doe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
(Martinez v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:55 pm
Meanwhile, the United States has filed a cert. petition in Garland v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
Roman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm
The litigation/fair report privileges did not, at this stage, bar the related state law claims. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:05 pm
Please note, however, that employers must comply with the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and other similar state law requirements regarding the procurement of background checks and credit reports by third parties. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:20 am
[v] There is a specific formula for calculating available income. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Finesse Wireless LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Bremeton School District, and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 8:07 am
Lowery and Guzman both highlight the need for balance and fairness in this process and send a clear message: If a party wants to assert diversity, they need to prove it. 1Guzman v. [read post]
