Search for: "Holmes v. Holmes"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2021, 10:40 am
Another view is the Cooper v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Tersigni v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:22 am
The world is more complicated than Sherlock Holmes thought. [read post]
5 May 2014, 11:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:44 am
Indeed, these three unresolved issues were explicitly named by Judge Holmes of the Tenth Circuit, concurring in Bishop v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 12:13 am
[(Holmes v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
It was unconstitutional to retroactively apply Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) to a defendant who, at age 19, had pleaded guilty to a sex offense under a state diversionary statute, the Michigan Supreme Court has ruled.In People v Temelkoski, the Michigan Supreme Court emphasized that, when prosecuting crimes, the state must adhere to the promises it makes to defendants who waive their right to a jury trial and plead guilty to a criminal offense under the… [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
The law does not demand good faith from a seller in “those vague commendations of his wares which manifestly are open to difference of opinion,” said Justice Holmes in Deming v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:24 am
If one's best analysis is that the court decided X v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Rahman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 6:34 am
., in US v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
In invalidating the “disparagement” section of the Lanham Act in Matal v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
—Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. 1Scott G. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:05 am
Gordon + Holmes’ representative plaintiff cases have involved national foodborne illness outbreaks where hundreds of people were sickened from eating contaminated food, including Chi-Chi’s v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
Holmes v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
As true conservatives have said for years, if the court could use the commerce clause to forbid a farmer from eating the wheat he grew (See, Wickard v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:23 am
Strickley v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:07 am
Justice Holmes said in Olmstead v. [read post]
