Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 12,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 11:51 am
To those of us who spend a lot of time reading recent opinions of the Court, it’s been clear for a number of years that many Justices are becoming increasingly comfortable doing their own factual research, outside the record and the briefs. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
Justice and the Enemy is in some places given to oversimplification. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:58 pm
The opinion is especially notable because it was written by Justice Posner. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 1:55 pm
So maybe Justice Yegan thinks -- entirely accurately -- that this opinion will be read (or quoted) more than the run-of-the-mill appellate opinion, so wants to add some spice.It's not my cup of tea, honestly. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:57 am
Franken reminded Graves that “you're good enough, you're smart enough, and dog-gone it, people like you. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
Taking a different tack on the public’s supposed naiveté, Jeff Shesol in this morning’s NYTimes.com at “Should Justices Keep Their Opinions to Themselves? [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:52 pm
Those opinions will be covered in a separate post, shortly. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:03 am
Some of my disagreement with this opinion is founded upon a displeasure with the Supreme Court's opinion about punitive damages in Campbell. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:08 am
CLS Bank is the fourth in a new wave of opinions from the Supreme Court on the topic of patent-eligible subject matter that began with its 2010 opinion in In re Bilski, and the second of these opinions to consider the patent eligibility of computer-implemented business methods. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 9:50 am
In Re Union Pacific Railroad Co. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:44 am
Now, if you’re like me, you picked up on the lack of agreement. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
In 1976, Potter Stewart, Lewis Powell, and Stevens jointly authored the plurality opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:04 pm
Justice Scalia offered one answer in Michael M. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:08 am
The re-hearing and re-writing of the Kennedy opinion was a good thing; we want the Supreme Court's opinions to be based on accurate facts and solid legal reasoning. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
As Professor Mark Graber recounts here, President Buchanan was tipped off by Justice Catron about the infamous Dred Scott opinion a few weeks before its scheduled release, and then the President pressured a northern justice to join the opinion along with the Southerners on the Court. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:17 am
If you’re going to change things, you have to be with the people who hold the levers. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:42 am
The Law Blog has never heard of a BBC radio show called “Law in Action,” but we’re determined to start tuning in — particularly after reading about the program’s interview yesterday with our very own Justice Scalia. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:50 pm
I see that President Obama had the Chief Justice re-administer the oath of office (correctly) this time in an ‘abundance of caution’ following the imperfect recitation of the oath the first time (due to mis-prompting by the Chief during the Inaugural). [read post]
2 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm
If justice delayed is justice denied for individuals, why is enforcement delayed not enforcement denied for society? [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
It defeats the whole purpose of punitive damages in contexts like this one.At the very end of the opinion, where you see the Court of Appeal's order that publishes the opinion, you find something that I've rarely (if ever) seen before -- Justice Hoch's one-sentence statement that she wouldn't publish the opinion. [read post]
