Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 12,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
Taking a different tack on the public’s supposed naiveté, Jeff Shesol in this morning’s NYTimes.com at “Should Justices Keep Their Opinions to Themselves? [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:03 am
Some of my disagreement with this opinion is founded upon a displeasure with the Supreme Court's opinion about punitive damages in Campbell. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:08 am
CLS Bank is the fourth in a new wave of opinions from the Supreme Court on the topic of patent-eligible subject matter that began with its 2010 opinion in In re Bilski, and the second of these opinions to consider the patent eligibility of computer-implemented business methods. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:52 pm
Those opinions will be covered in a separate post, shortly. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:04 pm
Justice Scalia offered one answer in Michael M. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 9:50 am
In Re Union Pacific Railroad Co. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:44 am
Now, if you’re like me, you picked up on the lack of agreement. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
In 1976, Potter Stewart, Lewis Powell, and Stevens jointly authored the plurality opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
As Professor Mark Graber recounts here, President Buchanan was tipped off by Justice Catron about the infamous Dred Scott opinion a few weeks before its scheduled release, and then the President pressured a northern justice to join the opinion along with the Southerners on the Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:08 am
The re-hearing and re-writing of the Kennedy opinion was a good thing; we want the Supreme Court's opinions to be based on accurate facts and solid legal reasoning. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:17 am
If you’re going to change things, you have to be with the people who hold the levers. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
It defeats the whole purpose of punitive damages in contexts like this one.At the very end of the opinion, where you see the Court of Appeal's order that publishes the opinion, you find something that I've rarely (if ever) seen before -- Justice Hoch's one-sentence statement that she wouldn't publish the opinion. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:42 am
The Law Blog has never heard of a BBC radio show called “Law in Action,” but we’re determined to start tuning in — particularly after reading about the program’s interview yesterday with our very own Justice Scalia. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:50 pm
I see that President Obama had the Chief Justice re-administer the oath of office (correctly) this time in an ‘abundance of caution’ following the imperfect recitation of the oath the first time (due to mis-prompting by the Chief during the Inaugural). [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 3:57 am
This comes not from the majority opinion, but Justice Gorsuch’s dissent. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Justices are even allowed to have strong opinions about controversial issues in dinner conversations. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
As with the Nader opinion, Justice Lewis again criticizes the majority with a strong dissent on the issue of second-tier certiorari review. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
Five Justices join the holding of the “majority” opinion (per Scalia) that by attaching and monitoring a GPS device the police conduct a “search”; four Justices (those in the Alito concurrence) reject that view. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:50 pm
Ct. of Justice). [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 6:52 am
Dep’t of Justice (D.D.C.) [read post]
