Search for: "Lopez v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
As Randy Barnett and Jeff Rosen have recognized, the Chief Justice’s tax-power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
Lopez (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 615, 629.)In re Malik J., supra.The court then took up Malik J. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:13 am
Lopez, 190 Cal. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:05 pm
In People v Lopez, an undercover narcotics officer approached defendant and who were standing outside a building located 420 feet from a public school in Bronx County. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:33 pm
Lopez,514 U.S. at 552-553 (citing Gibbons v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
Lopez. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:30 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
The NFIB v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 pm
The NFIB v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
Lopez v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm
Lopez v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
Singapore Two books that aim to better inform law practitioners on defamation cases and how tribunals should be managed were launched by the State Courts. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 6:42 am
’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and State Consumer Privacy Laws In re. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 1:04 pm
Lopez-Valenzuela. ** Without full briefing and oral argument, the Court ruled in an unsigned opinion that two state officials in Delaware had legal immunity from a lawsuit by the family of an inmate who had committed suicide in his cell. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:29 am
In Lopez v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:48 pm
Indeed, I have written about the surveillance of employees in the workplace, and their right to privacy pursuant to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, in a previous Inforrm post in the context of the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments in Bărbulescu v Romania [2016] App. no. 61496/08 and Lopez Ribalda v Spain [2019] ECHR. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
