Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 5,813
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2022, 8:51 am
Brown, 72 F.3d 25, 29 (5th Cir. 1995); In re Ruffalo, 390 U.S. 544, 556 (1968) (White, J., concurring). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
§ 2244(b). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:30 am
Article 5.1(b) also extends it to “lawful use”. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:58 am
Likewise, bad faith is also considered to potentially relate to the entire mark (Art. 59(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
It remitted the matter fo [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
It remitted the matter fo [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Net impression is what matters, to a reasonable person in target audience. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:39 pm
A valid copyright extends only to copyrightable subject matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:46 am
That means any such operation must be authorized as a separation-of-powers matter—either in the sense that it is within the inherent Article II authority of the commander in chief (either as a matter of national self-defense or, perhaps, as a matter of authority that lies below the threshold of the constitutional meaning of “war”), or that some other statute (like an AUMF) covers it. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:58 am
I have a quoted belief on the matter here.] [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
§§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A, C, D), 846. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:56 pm
Here's a good summary: Generally, the Equal Protection Clause only applies where a person can show that he is a) part of a protected class, and b) is being discriminated against because of his class membership. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:23 am
Baker and Emily B. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:59 pm
Posted by: Salvatore J. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 9:17 am
The article, Sailors and Marines Have Fewer Legal Rights than other Military Members as Their Military Lawyers Are Restricted in the Pre-Article 15 Advice They May Provide, 1 J. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Sept. 20, 2014 Serfass, J.), Judge Steven R. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 11:48 pm
Ultimately, Brown J. found that in the circumstances a sealing order was unwarranted. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their poorer… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:21 am
Richard J. [read post]
