Search for: "POWELL v. STATE" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Judge Carl Nichols said Powell and Lindell made their claims “knowing that they were false or with reckless disregard for the truth. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:24 pm by Mathews P. George
I shall argue in affirmative relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Hardie Trading Ltd. and Anr. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Xu was indicted for committing the crime of subverting state power on 5 August 2021. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term Commencing March 4, 1877 1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]