Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 1281 - 1300 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm by Sasha Volokh
As Jonathan writes, the Supreme Court (in Kisor v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” After reciting CEQA’s well established standards of review, the Court stated in part that: “[T]he present case requires us to apply these standards to an unusual EIR. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:09 pm by Steven Boutwell
The Sixth Circuit ultimately affirmed the 1.79% interest rate. [3] The PCI DSS is a security standard for organizations that handle branded credit cards from major credit card providers (i.e., Visa, MasterCard, Discover Financial Services, American Express, and JCB International) [4] The Sixth Circuit noted that their interpretation was consistent with the “only other federal appeals court” to address this precise issue—the Eighth Circuit in Schnuck Markets, Inc.… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
It relies on past precedents to justify the use of this novel constitutional authority. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
  The precise identity of the client, may differ from what lawyers outside the UK might consider to be the client, as we explain below. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
  And this may be precisely the type of case where the Court grants certiorari to spank down the "liberal" Ninth Circuit and it's "crazy" views about search-and-seizure jurisprudence. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
That brings us to new relist number three. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Mark Tushnet
Kersch tells us how the political-science agenda worked out. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
(One wonders whether Mueller went the facts-sans-recommendation route precisely to avoid inviting this response. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
That brings us to two related petitions: Comcast Corporation v. [read post]