Search for: "Pack v. State" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
I was expecting the worst when I saw the caption Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
Parsing the Oral Arguments: FEF and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is clear that politics in the United States frequently depart from norms of comity and respect. [read post]
18 May 2007, 7:06 am
In dumping the suit, Florida's Judge Gary Farmer ripped into traditional judicial style style in this concurring opinion in Funny Cide Ventures v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by Rosalind English
There follows a succinct account of Strasbourg jurisprudence  on this point, from registration of a doctor Konig v Germany (No1)  (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170   (civil right) to liability to tax (not a civil right) (Ferrazini v Italy  (44759/98) (2001) STC 1314), via the all important decision in  Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 ECHR not to allow administrative servants the guarantees of Article 6 because their employment involves important… [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
We promise the “big plans for the coming year that you really want us to be able to afford” are incentive enough but, in case you need more, “every dollar you donate between now and December 30 constitutes a separate entry into our drawing for this year's grand prize: Lawfare's special ‘Handmaiden of Power’ Starter Pack. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
The Friedrichs petition for rehearing has now racked up a six pack of reschedulings. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am by SHG
But what if Kim Davis thought they were charging too much, or too little, for a 24-pack of gummy bears? [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
They pitted small v. small employers, large v. large, municipal, gov’t., etc. [read post]