Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 1281 - 1300 of 41,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2021, 12:09 pm by John Graubert and Laura Kim
On Wednesday, January 13, the Supreme Court heard arguments in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am by Kit Chong Ng
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:39 am by Nick Dranias
The goal of the Compact for America (“CFA”) initiative is for the states to propose and ratify the powerful balanced budget amendment that is contained in the Compact for a Balanced Budget into the United States Constitution in as little as one session year, with a target of July 4, 2017, and a “do or die” date of April […] [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:43 pm
  The court held that no court had the power to order the Uighurs to be released to live in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:14 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Castro-Huerta -- Rebalancing Federal-State-Tribal Power Stacy Leeds, Robert J. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:26 am
The United States Supreme Court decided on December 6 to take up the case of American Electric Power v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by Ryke Longest
Cookson readily agreed that amending the compact would be beyond the power of the special master, citing Alabama v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Wells C. Bennett
Yesterday, Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Kadi v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Constitution's division of powers between the states and the federal government. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:08 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
 (R (Lumba) v Secretary of state for the Home Department (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 12). [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:02 pm
Guantanamo was chosen by the Bush administration in the belief that the writ of habeas corpus could not reach outside the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:52 am
Hammond required that state election statutes be strictly applied notwithstanding the negligence of state officials, instead finding that, in a absence of any clear evidence of the opposite conclusion, Lamb compels the exclusion of the noncompliant votes in order to safeguard the election process.The full opinion is available in PDF.The case was a "highlighted case. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:49 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice SinghviThe Supreme Court in Narayan Dutt & Ors. v State of Punjab, has examined the scope and powers of a State Governor to pardon an accused under Article 161 of the Constitution. [read post]