Search for: "Sanders v. Sanders"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 6:08 am
(Part One) – http://tinyurl.com/3p8hbzp (eDiscovery Team) A Timely Warning to Employees About Social Media – http://tinyurl.com/3vjacww (Amanda Bronstad) Baglow v Smith – The Increasing Importance of Context in Defamation Claims - http://tinyurl.com/44pmecq (Bob Tarantino) Connecticut Courts Weigh In on Social Media as Evidence – http://tinyurl.com/3hgy34v (Marie Grady) D.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
bit.ly/zfBOsG (Douglas Wood) Why eDiscovery Costs Too Much - bit.ly/AlwcAJ (Jason Krause) What Sun Tzu Can Teach Us About eDiscovery - bit.ly/y4RXps (Dave Walton) Reports and Resources A Delicate Balance | Organizational Barriers to Evidence-Based Management - bit.ly/xnjND8 (James Guszcza, Anthony Freda) A Methodology for Internal Web Ethics - bit.ly/wfROUP (Michalis Vafopoulos, Petros Stefaneas, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos, Kieron… [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
Pix Credit hereI wanted to take this opportunity to circulate a discussion draft of an essay, entitled "Legal Semiotics, Globalization and Governance. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
.#2: Balance of interests in SEP preliminary injunction proceedings and FRAND defenceSisvel / Xiaomi, Court of Appeal of The Hague 17 March 2020 (Judges Blok, Bonneur and Kamperman Sanders) [Dutch decision here]Dutch preliminary relief proceedings are effectively a mini-trial on the merits in which both infringement and validity (serious chance of invalidity in merits or opposition proceedings) is debated. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
Comms. on authorities' use, effectiveness, and privacy impact Sunsets: Rolls back sunset of FISA Amendments Act to 6/1/15 NSL authorities under ECPA (18 USC 2709), RFPA (12 USC 3414(a)(5)), FCRA (15 USC 1681u(a), (b)), and NSA of 1947 (50 USC 3162) revert back to pre-Patriot Act standard on 6/1/15; and FCRA Section 627 (15 USC 1681v) is repealed Udall-Wyden (9) S.1182: A bill to modify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to require specific evidence for access to… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
The science behind probiotics in dairy products such as yogurts and kefirs is an active area of research (Sanders 2009). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Thomas, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Washington, D.C., for amici Consumer Electronics Association, Digital Future Coalition, and Computer & Communications Industry Association. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
The phosphodiesterases 5 inhibitor medications (PDE5i) seem to arouse the litigation propensities of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 11:48 am
Sanders case (which I wrote about here) was no different. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:04 pm
John Weeks at The Integrator Blog has put together an excellent summary of new provisions of federal law affecting complementary, alternative and integrative medicine and health care. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
A Presidential Proclamation to End the Iraq War: Unilateral Executive Action to Defang a Zombie AUMF
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
With his decision to end his bid for a second term, President Biden may now be considering how to cement his presidential legacy. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:16 pm
The case is Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
(The Doe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
