Search for: "State v. Board of Education"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 5,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2024, 8:18 am
–MacRae v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:08 am
Shibley gets in some law, such as Davis v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 3:10 pm
Also this afternoon, the Solicitor General recommended the Court deny certiorari in Board of Education of New York v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
However, the appeals court found that the trial judge had correctly concluded that Dougherty enjoyed personal immunity based on the state of the law prior to Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 10:53 am
The calendar includes some high-profile cases – most notably, Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
But I will note that in Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
A tenured employee who resigns from his or her position and is subsequently reemployed by his or her former employer in the same title is not automatically entitled to tenure in the positionSpringer v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:53 am
Healy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:55 am
Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:55 am
Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:20 am
Under federal law, unlawfully present aliens generally are ineligible for state or local public benefits, including postsecondary education benefits such as reduced tuition, unless a state has enacted a law affirmatively providing for such eligibility. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:18 am
Fowkes and her attorney of the denial by letter to her attorney, which stated in part: “Our review, which included a Board Certified [Independent Physician Consultant], who spoke with Ms. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:23 am
Accordingly, said the Court of Appeals, “we cannot conclude that the penalty of dismissal imposed . . . shocks the judicial conscience as a matter of law,” citing a number of decisions, including Matter of Will v Frontier Central School District Board. of Education. 97 NY2d 690, and Matter of Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222.The court observed that: “The Appellate Division has no discretionary authority or interest of… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
